A religion was born in a race, created a sect among them and expanded the space between Him and the man with all sorts of superstitions. Later a Man had born to make the individual see Him face to face but politics had given a new religious name to it and spread it all over the Europe with both sword and charity. In between one more emerged in the name of equality and unification but blood ran from Pacific to the Atlantic. Aftermath, the philosophy and the beliefs of subcontinent were given an another religious name. All started quarrelling for centuries my book only contains truth, my mythology is the only history, my worship is the only purest, my symbol is the only sacred, my place is the only holy, with all these the fanatic mind had been developed, leaving the basic common ethical and moral concepts.
After the end of the world war-II, when a separate country was created for an age old religious sect who was under constant oppression all over the known history from the old Babylonians to the recent Nazis many thought finally justice had done, now they could live their own free life but it just short lived. In no time they proved they did not learn any good things from the oppression and are no way different from others. The top dog who claims the only protector of human rights and barks like anything even for a small noise in its opponent world, simply shuts its mouth when its close ally is doing the same. Also the religious organizations and groups who are now giving their hand of solidarity and protesting against the massacres, where were they when their religious terrorists did the same thing in other countries? For each and every country and for each and every individual, when it/he does the mistake, it is never a mistake and if others do it, then they shout. Even till today, we consider other side of partition as our first rival in many fields, completely keeping aside the kingdom which ruled ridiculously for 200 years. Why so? it is universally known. Neither am I mean we treat the English country as our rivals nor rivalry is good. This kind of attitude harms the universal brotherhood.
Around the nucleus there are both positives and negatives, former is more close to it but we just stuck at the later. Around Him we created all the fuss. How can a man on onside says He is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient and on the other tries to confine Him according to a book or to a particular belief ?, better to be an atheist than having such kind of theism. What religion had done to the world is it created innumerable massacres, there were and there are good things- charities, asylums, hospitals, educational institutes but majority of them have selfish motives and interests. Is there any end to this ? Does theism have anything to do with religion ?